Reported / Citable
Background
Carlos Wilfredo Sanchez-Vasquez appeared with counsel before a magistrate judge for entry of a felony guilty plea. The matter had been referred under a general order for the taking of the plea.
After being advised of his right to have the district judge take the plea and receiving the required Rule 11 admonishments, Sanchez-Vasquez pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One of the indictment, illegal reentry into the United States.
The Court’s Holding
Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters found that Sanchez-Vasquez knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights, understood the charge and potential penalties, was competent to plead guilty, and had the advice of counsel.
The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea and found Sanchez-Vasquez guilty of the charged offense. The judge recommended that the district court accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt; sentencing was referred to the presiding district judge.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 requirements satisfied, including voluntariness, competency, and a factual basis.
- The recommendation remains subject to objections and final action by the district court.
Why It Matters
The order illustrates the magistrate judge’s role in conducting a felony plea proceeding with the defendant’s consent while leaving acceptance of the recommendation and sentencing to the district judge. Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.