Reported / Citable
Background
Roberto Carlos Leal-Moran appeared with counsel before a magistrate judge for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. The case had been referred under a general order for the taking of the plea.
After being advised of his right to have the plea taken by a district judge and receiving the required Rule 11 admonishments, Leal-Moran pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One, charging a false statement or representation to an agency or department of the United States.
The Court’s Holding
Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters found that Leal-Moran consented to the magistrate judge conducting the plea proceeding; understood the charge, potential penalties, and his rights; and knowingly, freely, and voluntarily waived those rights.
The magistrate judge further found Leal-Moran competent, determined that a sufficient factual basis supported the plea, and found him guilty of the charged offense. The judge recommended that the district court accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt; sentencing remains for the presiding district judge.
Key Takeaways
- The recommendation concerns acceptance of a guilty plea, not sentencing.
- Leal-Moran pleaded guilty without a plea agreement.
- Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.
Why It Matters
The ruling documents completion of the Rule 11 plea colloquy and places the case before the district judge for any objections, acceptance of the plea, entry of judgment, and sentencing.