Reported / Citable
Background
The case was referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters to take J Lindolfo Mendez-Sorto’s felony guilty plea. Mendez-Sorto appeared with counsel on July 8, 2026, consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea, and was advised of his rights under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.
Mendez-Sorto pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment charging illegal reentry into the United States. Sentencing remained for the presiding district judge.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that Mendez-Sorto understood the charge, potential penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights, and that he freely and voluntarily waived those rights. The judge also found Mendez-Sorto competent to plead guilty and concluded that the plea was voluntary and supported by a sufficient factual basis.
The magistrate judge found Mendez-Sorto guilty of the charge to which he pleaded and recommended that the district judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The findings and recommendation also noted that Mendez-Sorto may be subject to restitution and advised the parties that objections were due within 14 days of receipt.
Key Takeaways
- Mendez-Sorto pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge found the plea knowing, voluntary, competent, and supported by a sufficient factual basis.
- The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of the plea and entry of a judgment of guilt, while leaving sentencing to the presiding district judge.
Why It Matters
The recommendation documents the Rule 11 findings required before the district court accepts Mendez-Sorto’s felony guilty plea. It does not impose a sentence; the case was referred to the presiding district judge for sentencing.