Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Livingston v. City of Splendora — dismissed the appeal on the parties’ unopposed motion

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Ryan A. Livingston v. The City of Splendora
Court
Texas Ninth Court of Appeals
Judge
Johnson (appointment info not available); Wright (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
July 23, 2026
Docket No.
09-26-00022-CV
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Voluntary Dismissal, Accelerated Appeal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ryan A. Livingston appealed from a proceeding in the 457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, involving the City of Splendora. The appeal was designated as accelerated.

Before the appellate court issued a decision, Livingston filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. The City of Splendora joined in the motion.

The Court’s Holding

The Texas Ninth Court of Appeals granted the unopposed motion and dismissed the accelerated appeal under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and 43.2(f).

The memorandum opinion was issued per curiam and did not address the merits of the underlying dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may seek voluntary dismissal before the appellate court issues its decision.
  • The City of Splendora joined Livingston’s motion, leaving it unopposed.
  • The court dismissed the accelerated appeal without deciding the merits.

Why It Matters

The decision illustrates the procedural mechanism for ending a Texas appeal voluntarily before an appellate ruling. Because the court reached no merits issues, the opinion establishes no substantive rule concerning the parties’ underlying dispute.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top