Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. CESAREO-Zacariaz — Magistrate Judge recommends accepting guilty plea for illegal reentry

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America vs. Teodulo CESAREO-Zacariaz
Court
U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
Judge
JOSEPH A CORDOVA
Date Decided
July 02, 2026
Docket No.
DR:26-CR-00873(1)-AM
Topics
Guilty Plea; Illegal Reentry; Magistrate Judge Recommendation; Criminal Procedure

Background

This case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for the purpose of taking a felony guilty plea. On July 2, 2026, the Defendant, Teodulo CESAREO-Zacariaz, appeared before the Magistrate Judge with counsel. The Defendant was informed of his rights, including the right to have his plea taken by a United States District Judge, and was admonished in accordance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The Court’s Holding

The Magistrate Judge made several findings of fact, concluding that the Defendant, with the advice of counsel, consented to the plea being taken by the undersigned. The judge found that the Defendant understood the nature of the charges and penalties, comprehended and freely waived his constitutional and statutory rights, and entered his plea freely and voluntarily. It was also determined that the Defendant was competent to enter the plea, and that there was a sufficient factual basis for it.

The Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the indictment, illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, without a plea agreement. Based on these findings, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Defendant’s guilty plea be accepted and that a judgment of guilt be entered against him. The case was referred to the presiding United States District Judge for sentencing.

Key Takeaways

  • A U.S. Magistrate Judge conducted a felony guilty plea hearing.
  • The Defendant, Teodulo CESAREO-Zacariaz, pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States.
  • The Magistrate Judge found the plea to be knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis.
  • The Magistrate Judge recommended that the District Judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt.

Why It Matters

This document illustrates the procedural role of a U.S. Magistrate Judge in the federal criminal justice system, particularly in the context of accepting guilty pleas. While the Magistrate Judge conducts the plea hearing and makes findings and recommendations, the ultimate decision to accept the plea and proceed with sentencing rests with the presiding U.S. District Judge. This division of labor helps manage the judicial caseload while ensuring due process for defendants.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top