Reported / Citable
Background
Alicia Madelen Perez Garcia was charged in federal court in the Western District of Texas with making false statements or representations to a federal agency or department, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2). The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Joseph A Cordova for the taking of the felony guilty plea pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3).
On June 15, 2026, the defendant appeared before the magistrate judge with counsel. The magistrate judge personally addressed the defendant in open court and provided the admonitions required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, which governs guilty pleas in federal criminal cases.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that the defendant understood the nature of the charges and applicable penalties, understood her constitutional and statutory rights, and freely and voluntarily waived those rights. The court determined that the defendant’s guilty plea to Count One was made voluntarily and without any plea agreement.
Finding that the defendant was competent to enter a guilty plea and that there existed a sufficient factual basis for the plea, the magistrate judge recommended acceptance of the guilty plea and entry of judgment of guilt against the defendant. The magistrate specifically noted that the defendant acknowledged potential liability for restitution. The case is now referred to the presiding District Judge for sentencing.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pled guilty to a federal false statements charge without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge found all procedural requirements of Rule 11 were satisfied, including that the plea was knowing and voluntary.
- Sentencing will be conducted by the District Judge and will follow the standard Federal Sentencing Guidelines process.
- The defendant may be subject to restitution in addition to any custodial sentence.
Why It Matters
This recommendation demonstrates strict compliance with federal guilty plea procedures. By taking the plea before a magistrate judge and creating a detailed record of the defendant’s knowing and voluntary waiver of rights, the government ensures the plea will withstand appellate scrutiny. False statements charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 are commonly used to prosecute federal crimes ranging from immigration fraud to false loan applications.
The lack of a plea agreement is notable, as it suggests the defendant accepted responsibility without negotiated benefits, which may be viewed favorably during sentencing considerations.