Reported / Citable
Background
Franklin Lenin Vallecillo-Rodas was charged with illegal reentry into the United States. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova for the taking of a felony guilty plea pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3).
On June 18, 2026, the defendant appeared before the Magistrate Judge in open court with his counsel. The court personally addressed the defendant and advised him of his right to have the plea taken by the District Judge, informing him of his rights and obligations under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.
The Court’s Holding
The Magistrate Judge found that the defendant, with advice of counsel, knowingly and voluntarily pled guilty to Count One—illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The defendant entered the plea without a plea agreement and was found to be competent and to have understood the nature of the charges, penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights, which he waived knowingly and voluntarily.
Based on these findings, the Magistrate Judge determined there was a sufficient factual basis for the guilty plea and recommended its acceptance. The court entered a finding of guilt on the charge and noted the defendant may be subject to restitution. Sentencing will be conducted by the presiding District Judge.
Key Takeaways
- Defendant pled guilty to illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 without a plea agreement
- Magistrate Judge found the plea satisfied all Rule 11 requirements: knowing, voluntary, competent, and with sufficient factual basis
- Recommendation now proceeds to District Judge for final acceptance and sentencing determination
- Defendant may be subject to restitution as ordered at sentencing
Why It Matters
This case reflects the procedural requirements for federal guilty pleas, particularly in immigration cases prosecuted in border jurisdictions. The Magistrate Judge’s recommendation demonstrates the strict compliance protocol required under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 to ensure defendants’ pleas are knowing and voluntary.
For practitioners, this case underscores the importance of proper Rule 11 colloquy and the requirement that defendants be fully advised of their rights and receive adequate counsel before accepting pleas. The matter now awaits District Judge approval and sentencing, where the final judgment will be entered.