Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Long — Magistrate Judge recommends acceptance of guilty plea to felon-in-possession firearm charge

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Joshua Long
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Midland/Odessa Division)
Judge
RONALD C. GRIFFIN (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, 2018)
Date Decided
June 16, 2026
Docket No.
7:26-cr-00069
Topics
Criminal procedure, felon in possession of firearm, guilty plea
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joshua Long was charged in federal court with violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(8), pertaining to felon in possession of a firearm. On June 9, 2026, the case appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald C. Griffin for guilty plea and allocution. The proceeding followed Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, which governs the administration of guilty pleas in federal court.

Long appeared with counsel and executed a written consent to proceed with the guilty plea before the magistrate judge. The defendant acknowledged that he had been charged under his correct legal name and was advised of all consequences of his plea, including the statutory penalty range and mandatory special assessments.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Long entered his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily, with full understanding of the nature of the charge and the consequences of his plea. The court determined that the defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea and that the plea is supported by an independent factual basis containing each essential element of the offense.

Long pleaded guilty without a written plea agreement; any oral agreements were stated into the record by the parties. Based on these findings, the magistrate judge recommended to the District Judge that the guilty plea be accepted and that Long be adjudged guilty of the charged offense. The recommendation was issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), which authorizes magistrate judges to administer guilty pleas subject to final approval and sentencing by the district judge.

Key Takeaways

  • Long’s guilty plea was found to be knowing, voluntary, and supported by an independent factual basis for all elements of the offense.
  • The statutory penalty range is up to 15 years imprisonment, up to 3 years supervised release, and a fine not to exceed $250,000, plus a $100 mandatory special assessment.
  • If the court finds three prior convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses, the minimum sentence increases to at least 15 years imprisonment, with supervised release up to 5 years.
  • Long agreed to forfeit property identified in the government’s forfeiture demand contained in the indictment.

Why It Matters

Felon-in-possession charges under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) are serious federal felonies that carry substantial prison time and intersect with both firearms regulation and criminal history considerations. The statutory enhancement under § 924(a)(8) can significantly increase penalties based on prior convictions, making prior record analysis critical in sentencing. This case illustrates the procedural requirements for accepting guilty pleas in federal court and the safeguards built into Rule 11 to ensure that pleas are truly voluntary and informed.

The magistrate’s recommendation is subject to the district judge’s final review and approval, during which the parties retain the right to file objections within 14 days. Once the district judge accepts the plea and imposes sentence, appellate review is limited to grounds of plain error or manifest injustice unless objections were timely filed.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top